Home
Flying, Defying, Rebelling, and Just About Anything Else One Can Think Of [entries|friends|calendar]
Frolicks About In Summer Skin

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ calendar | livejournal calendar ]

Friends Only [Jan 25 2010 5:40pm]
[ mood | calm ]

Ok doke finoke...

So this journal is now

 


FRIENDS ONLY


As you can see. It's locked. Anyway. If you want to be added, then leave a comment! Easy as that.

Oh yeah, and I heart new friends, sooo yeah. This isn't locked because I'm a meanie. Just to say.
READ 16 COMMENT

50 Book Challenge [Jan 05 2010 11:16am]
[ mood | groggy ]
[ music | Epiphany : Sweeney Todd BRC ]

So this is a reading-50-books-in-a-year challenge. I imagine it won't be too difficult, but then again, it's only the fifth day of the new year. Anything could happen.

Updated: 3/07/2008 | Completed: 20




Banner by: [info]humbuggirl

READ 6 COMMENT

I get it. Ok? I. Get. It. [Apr 07 2008 2:57pm]
[ mood | bitchy ]

Dear Human Rights People.

I totally understand what you're going for. I mean, truly, I do. I mean, as much as I love China and everything about it, I too don't feel too hot about it's stance on Human Rights. Seriously. If anything, I'm on your side.

But seriously. Now? When the Olympic Torch is being passed around the world? NOW you want to complain? What the hell is wrong with you? I'm not angry because you want people to boycott the games, or that the authorities in Paris had to put out the flame multiple times because of your protests, but why now? If you feel so strongly about this, which you evidently do, what has taken you so long?

Why has it taken you so long to speak up? Why are you taking out your anger on a sporting event? And sure, maybe having Beijing hosting will help bring awareness, but you could have started this AGES ago. Beijing got the games years ago, and did I hear anything from you when it was first announced? No. No, I did not. A year later, construction has started and has been told to stop because it's going too fast, and do I hear anything? No. The Official Logo comes out? Nothing. The top swimmers from America go to Beijing and approve of the swimming facilities? Nothing. George W. Bush goes for a run/bicycle ride in Beijing? Nothing.

But now, when it comes to the significant torch-run (or whatever the official name for that is), symbolising the whole world uniting as a sporting community, symbolising the whole magnificence of the games, you decide to spoil the party. And sure, building up to the torch-run you've been protesting all over the place, to ruin the meaning of the Olympics? I'm sorry, but in my books, that goes a bit too far. Sports do not equal politics.

Do you really think that by hosting the Olympics, China will be able to shed it's shady governmental rule? No, it won't. So calm the fuck down. The whole idea of having the Olympics hosted all around the world is to open up the world to a wider audience, so that even though they may never go, they will be able to see the world, and what it has to offer. The Olympics will not wipe China's slate clean. The Olympics were held in fucking Berlin for fuck's sake, during the Nazi regime! And I'm sorry, but Hitler and Co. did worse than Hu and Co. are doing now. Of course, only time will be able to tell us if Hu is able to surpass Hitler, but that's not my point.

My point is that if you've felt so passionate about the Human Rights violations in China, then why haven't you been making a bigger deal of it before now? The only discernable answer I can come up with is that most of you have jumped onto the bandwagon. Whether most of you jump back off it after the games has yet to be seen, but if you don't continue this protesting after the games are over, I'm going to be pissed. People are having their rights taken away from them left right and centre on the Mainland, and if you stop the fight, I'm going to be so pissed off with you lot; the idea that protesting human rights' violations have become fashionable just disgusts me.

But for now, leave the Olympics alone. This is a time for the world's athletes to show off the goods, to engage in friendly/not-so-friendly competition, and to live out their dreams since they were children. How dare you ruin that for them?! These athletes, you must remember, rely on these games like you would rely on your job. These athletes are not all Kobe Bryant or David Beckham. They don't get paid all year round, and sometimes they don't even get paid during their sport's season. These people are so dedicated to pushing themselves this far into the competition, to beat out that many athletes on all different levels, and you really want to ruin this for them?

And yes, I agree, winning a gold doesn't compare to the plight of Tibet, or the censored population on the Mainland, but again, I stress, this is the Olympics. The Olympics does not = China's policies.

I get what you're trying to do, I get what you're doing, but I don't have to approve of it, nor do you need my approval, but as someone who truly does want China to reform it's ways, and as someone who truly does love the Olympics and everything they stand for, I just want you to look at yourselves and think.

Not much Love, but Grudging Support,
Gillian

Edit:  In short: China doesn't give a rat's ass what anyone really thinks.

READ 4 COMMENT

Nooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!! [Nov 22 2007 12:20pm]
[ mood | depressed ]

COPENHAGEN, Denmark - Denmark will hold a referendum on whether to adopt the euro and drop exemptions to closer cooperation with the EU on defense and law enforcement, the prime minister said Thursday.

 

Moar )

 

READ 2 COMMENT

LOL [Nov 18 2007 11:04pm]
[ music | Robot Chicken ]

LONDON - The French have their "Liberté, égalité, fraternité." The Americans have "In God we trust." Even tiny nations like Antigua and Fiji have stirring calls to nationhood, faith, solidarity.

Not so Britain. Remarkably, for a country with such a rich history and distinctive national traits, there have been no formal mottos to describe the British mission statement. Until now.

Keen to redefine an increasingly diverse nation and its values, the government has launched a quest for a national maxim. Meant to be "truly representative," the motto will be arrived at by 1,000 members of the British public. This week, the BBC and the Times newspaper jump-started the process by soliciting suggestions on their websites.

"Once Great: Britain," offered one contributor. "Americans who missed the boat," read a second. "At least we're not French" quipped a third. While some were genuine efforts, most were scornful in tone – revealing more about the British today than any motto could.

"It's stirring up a good characteristic of the British, and that is a sardonic humor towards any attempt by government to do unnecessary and pompous things," says Sir Bernard Crick, a former government advisor on citizenship. He says there's a good reason why Britain doesn't have a motto – it did not have the same grand cataclysmic moment of creation that other countries did.

"When the American states gathered together, they had 'e pluribus unum' and it was there right from the beginning and it meant something," he says. "We have no historical occasion like that. You have to take the British sense of history as a whole and I don't think it can be summed up. It would either be vague waffle or terribly contentious."

"You can't encompass a whole national history in a slogan," says Professor Crick. "It's ridiculous."

Why Brown is playing the British card
Upon first taking office in the summer, Brown said that he lived by his high school's hallowed maxim, "usque conabor" (I will try my utmost).

But one respondent to the Times' survey turned the joke back on the prime minister by offering a faux-Latin motto – "Dipso, fatso, bingo, ASBO, Tesco" – which neatly addresses the country's contemporary problems with alcohol, obesity, gambling, antisocial youth, and materialism.

A Monitor minisurvey revealed a similarly jaundiced view. "Get blotto, play the lotto, that's our motto," was the only printable response.

Despite the mockery, however, Brown believes he has good reason to play the British card. Nationalism is rising in Wales, Scotland, and England, and disenchanted ethnic minorities are picking at the seams of British unity. Homegrown terrorism has added extra urgency. The prime minister has already floated ideas like a new "national day" and new citizenship rules in a quest for greater social cohesion and peppers his speeches with the word British far more than Tony Blair ever did.

But philosopher and author AC Grayling says that a new motto is not the way to go about this.

"It's characteristic of how we have done things, a rather cheap, slogan-based solution to what are more complicated problems," he says. "The sneering response from the public is characteristic of the bleak British sense of humor."

Even the upsides of Britishness were snubbed by respondents. One, referring to the popular slogan of the '90s, scoffed, "Cool Britannia, yeah, right, whatever ..."

'Shakespeare might to do the trick'
Still, a country like Britain has plenty of cultural landmarks from which to draw, from William Shakespeare to fish and chips. Author Chris Cleave, who writes about contemporary Britain in his fiction, thinks "something from Shakespeare might do the trick."

"I like 'Virtue is bold, and goodness never fearful' (from "Measure for Measure").

But even he can't resist the temptation to ridicule. "How about something that encapsulates one of our most venerable sporting traditions, our national preference for a plucky underdog and our refusal to give up hope even when we are totally outgunned. How about "Come on Tim!" (A reference to Tim Henman, saluted perennially as a tennis hero despite never having got beyond the semifinals at Wimbledon).

Trying their best
Intriguingly, the younger generation may have more time for a new maxim than their more cynical elders. At Kingston University in southwest London, geography student Jeremy Puncher says he supports the government's attempt to instill greater pride in Britishness. Of the motto idea, he says: "It can't hurt. It should have something to do with togetherness, freedom, patience, acceptance of other cultures."

Leon Wright, another student, says that although being British doesn't mean much to him, the right motto could prove inspiring. "It should be something like 'try your best,' or 'be the best that you can be,' as opposed to 'love the queen."

The government says it has plenty of worthwhile suggestions and it now plans to decide on the motto and how it should be used. But clearly Brown will have to "try his utmost" to convince his nation that it's a worthwhile exercise. As one contributor put it this week, "We're British; we don't do mottos."

READ 7 COMMENT

[Nov 03 2007 9:51pm]
[ mood | discontent ]
[ music | Don't Give Up : Kate Bush & Peter Gabriel ]

So I figured I'd do this...for some reason I can't remember. Oh, I know-more presents. Heh. No, I'm kidding, I promise (or am I?).

Anyway, I think it's a nice idea, and if more of you peeps do it, then other peeps will join in, thus spreading the joy of Christmas. Or, if you're not Christian, the joy of the winter holidays.


Rules )



List )
READ 3 COMMENT

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]